ProB in general requires all deferred sets to be given a finite cardinality. If no cardinality is specified, a default size will be used. Also, unless finite bounds can be inferred by the ProB constraint solver, mathematical integers will only be enumerated within MININT to MAXINT (and ProB will generate enumeration warnings in case no solution is found).
Other general limitations are:
Also, ProB will generate a warning when variable capture may occur.
See the page Using ProB with Atelier B for more details.
It is possible to use multiple classical B machines with ProB. However, ProB may not enforce all of the classical B visibility rules (although we try to). As far as the visibility rules are concerned, it is thus a good idea to check the machines in another B tool, such as Atelier B or the B-Toolkit.
While refinements are supported, the preconditions of operations are not propagated down to refinement machines. This means that you should rewrite the preconditions of operations (and, if necessary, reformulate them in terms of the variables of the refinement machine). Also, the refinement checker does not yet check the gluing invariant.
Note however, that for Rodin Event-B models we now support multi-level animation and validation.
P & Q conjunction P or Q disjunction P => Q implication P <=> Q equivalence not P negation !(x).(P=>Q) universal quantification #(x).(P&Q) existential quantification
Above, P and Q stand for predicates. Inside the universal quantification, P must give a value type to the quantified variable. Note: you can also introduce multiple variables inside a universal or existential quantification, e.g., !(x,y).(P => Q).
E = F equality E /= F disequality
TRUE FALSE BOOL set of boolean values ({TRUE,FALSE}) bool(P) convert predicate into BOOL value
Warning: TRUE and FALSE are values and not predicates in B and cannot be combined using logical connectives. To combine two boolean values x and y using conjunction you have to write x=TRUE & y=TRUE. To convert a predicate such as z>0 into a boolean value you have to use bool(z>0).
{} empty set {E} singleton set {E,F} set enumeration {x|P} comprehension set POW(S) power set POW1(S) set of non-empty subsets FIN(S) set of all finite subsets FIN1(S) set of all non-empty finite subsets card(S) cardinality S*T cartesian product S\/T set union S/\T set intersection S-T set difference E:S element of E/:S not element of S<:T subset of S/<:T not subset of S<<:T strict subset of S/<<:T not strict subset of union(S) generalised union over sets of sets inter(S) generalised intersection over sets of sets UNION(z).(P|E) generalised union with predicate INTER(z).(P|E) generalised intersection with predicate
INTEGER set of integers NATURAL set of natural numbers NATURAL1 set of non-zero natural numbers INT set of implementable integers (MININT..MAXINT) NAT set of implementable natural numbers NAT1 set of non-zero implementable natural numbers n..m set of numbers from n to m MININT the minimum implementable integer MAXINT the maximum implementable integer m>n greater than m<n less than m>=n greater than or equal m<=n less than or equal max(S) maximum of a set of numbers min(S) minimum of a set of numbers m+n addition m-n difference m*n multiplication m/n division m**n power m mod n remainder of division PI(z).(P|E) Set product SIGMA(z).(P|E) Set summation succ(n) successor (n+1) pred(n) predecessor (n-1) 0xH hexadecimal literal, where H is a sequence of letters in [0-9A-Fa-f]
S<->T relation S<<->T total relation S<->>T surjective relation S<<->>T total surjective relation E|->F maplet dom(r) domain of relation ran(r) range of relation id(S) identity relation S<|r domain restriction S<<|r domain subtraction r|>S range restriction r|>>S range subtraction r~ inverse of relation r[S] relational image r1<+r2 relational overriding (r2 overrides r1) r1><r2 direct product {x,(y,z) | x,y:r1 & x,z:r2} (r1;r2) relational composition {x,y| x|->z:r1 & z|->y:r2} (r1||r2) parallel product {((x,v),(y,w)) | x,y:r1 & v,w:r2} prj1(S,T) projection function (usage prj1(Dom,Ran)(Pair)) prj2(S,T) projection function (usage prj2(Dom,Ran)(Pair)) closure1(r) transitive closure closure(r) reflexive & transitive closure (non-standard version: closure({}) = {}; see iterate(r,0) below) iterate(r,n) iteration of r with n>=0 (Note: iterate(r,0) = id(s) where s = dom(r)\/ran(r)) fnc(r) translate relation A<->B into function A+->POW(B) rel(r) translate relation A<->POW(B) into relation A<->B
S+->T partial function S-->T total function S+->>T partial surjection S-->>T total surjection S>+>T partial injection S>->T total injection S>+>>T partial bijection S>->>T total bijection %x.(P|E) lambda abstraction f(E) function application f(E1,...,En) is now supported (as well as f(E1|->E2))
<> or [] empty sequence [E] singleton sequence [E,F] constructed sequence seq(S) set of sequences over Sequence seq1(S) set of non-empty sequences over S iseq(S) set of injective sequences iseq1(S) set of non-empty injective sequences perm(S) set of bijective sequences (permutations) size(s) size of sequence s^t concatenation E->s prepend element s<-E append element rev(s) reverse of sequence first(s) first element last(s) last element front(s) front of sequence (all but last element) tail(s) tail of sequence (all but first element) conc(S) concatenation of sequence of sequences s/|\n take first n elements of sequence s\|/n drop first n elements from sequence
struct(ID:S,...,ID:S) set of records with given fields and field types rec(ID:E,...,ID:E) construct a record with given field names and values E'ID get value of field with name ID
"astring" a specific (single-line) string value '''astring''' an alternate way of writing (multi-line) strings, no need to escape " ```tstring``` template strings, where ${Expr} parts are evaluated and converted to string STRING the set of all strings Note: for the moment enumeration of strings is limited (if a variable of type STRING is not given a value by the machine, then ProB assumes STRING = { "STR1", "STR2" })
Atelier-B does not support any operations on strings, apart from equality and disequality. However, the ProB external function library contains several operators on strings. ProB also allows multi-line strings. As of version 1.7.0, ProB will support the following escape sequences within strings:
\n newline (ASCII character 13) \r carriage return (ASCII 10) \t tab (ASCII 9) \" the double quote symbol " \' the single quote symbol ' \\ the backslash symbol
Within single-line string literals, you do not need to escape '. Within multi-line string literals, you do not need to escape " and you can use tabs and newlines. ProB assumes that all B machines and strings use the UTF-8 encoding.
The library LibraryStrings.def in stdlib contains additional useful external functions (like TO_STRING, STRING_SPLIT, FORMAT_TO_STRING, INT_TO_HEX_STRING, ...). Some of the sequence operators work also on strings:
size(s) the length of a string s rev(s) the reverse a string s s ^ t the concatenation of two strings conc(ss) the concatenation of a sequence of strings
You can turn this support off using the STRING_AS_SEQUENCE preference.
REAL set of reals FLOAT set of floating point numbers i.f real literal, where i and f are sequences of digits real(n) convert an integer n into a real number floor(r) convert a real r to an integer ceiling(r) convert a real r to an integer
Standard arithmetic operators can be applied to reals: +, - , *, /, SIGMA, PI. Exponentiation of a real with an integer is also allowed. The comparison predicates =, /=, <, >, <=, >= also all work. Support for reals and floats is experimental. The definition in Atelier-B is also not stable yet. Currently ProB supports floating point numbers only. Warning: properties such as associativity and commutativity of arithmetic operators thus does not hold. The library LibraryReals.def in stdlib contains additional useful external functions (like RSIN, RCOS, RLOG, RSQRT, RPOW, ...). You can turn off support for REALS using the preference ALLOW_REALS.
Nodes in the tree are denoted by index sequences (branches), e.g, n=[1,2,1] Each node in the tree is labelled with an element from a domain S A tree is a function mapping of branches to elements of the domain S.
tree(S) set of trees over domain S btree(S) set of binary trees over domain S top(t) top of a tree const(E,s) construct a tree from info E and sequence of subtrees s rank(t,n) rank of the node at end of branch n in the tree t father(t,n) father of the node denoted by branch n in the tree t son(t,n,i) the ith son of the node denoted by branch n in tree t sons(t) the sequence of sons of the root of the tree t subtree(t,n) arity(t,n) bin(E) construct a binary tree with a single node E bin(tl,E,tr) construct a binary tree with root info E and subtrees tl,tr left(t) the left (first) son of the root of the binary tree t right(t) the right (last) son of the root of the binary tree t sizet(t) the size of the tree (number of nodes) prefix(t) the nodes of the tree t in prefix order postfix(t) the nodes of the tree t in prefix order mirror, infix are recognised by the parser but not yet supported by ProB itself
ProB allows the following for predicates and expressions:
IF P1 THEN E1 ELSE E2 END IF P1 THEN E1 ELSIF P2 THEN E2 ... ELSE En END conditional for expressions or predicates E1,E2,...,En LET x1,... BE x1=E1 & ... IN E END
Note: the expressions E1,... defining x1,... are not allowed to use x1,...
skip no operation x := E assignment f(x) := E functional override x :: S choice from set x : (P) choice by predicate P (constraining x) x <-- OP(x) call operation and assign return value G||H parallel substitution** G;H sequential composition** ANY x,... WHERE P THEN G END non deterministic choice LET x,... BE x=E & ... IN G END VAR x,... IN G END generate local variables PRE P THEN G END ASSERT P THEN G END CHOICE G OR H END IF P THEN G END IF P THEN G ELSE H END IF P1 THEN G1 ELSIF P2 THEN G2 ... END IF P1 THEN G1 ELSIF P2 THEN G2 ... ELSE Gn END SELECT P THEN G WHEN ... WHEN Q THEN H END SELECT P THEN G WHEN ... WHEN Q THEN H ELSE I END CASE E OF EITHER m THEN G OR n THEN H ... END END CASE E OF EITHER m THEN G OR n THEN H ... ELSE I END END WHEN P THEN G END is a synonym for SELECT P THEN G END **: cannot be used at the top-level of an operation, but needs to be wrapped inside a BEGIN END or another statement (to avoid problems with the operators ; and ||).
MACHINE or REFINEMENT or IMPLEMENTATION Note: machine parameters can either be SETS (if identifier is all upper-case) or scalars (i.e., integer, boolean or SET element; if identifier is not all upper-case; typing must be provided be CONSTRAINTS) You can also use MODEL or SYSTEM as a synonym for MACHINE, as well as EVENTS as a synonym for OPERATIONS. ProB also supports the ref keyword of Atelier-B for event refinement.
CONSTRAINTS P (logical predicate) SETS S;T={e1,e2,...};... CONSTANTS x,y,... CONCRETE_CONSTANTS cx,cy,... PROPERTIES P (logical predicate) DEFINITIONS m(x,...) == BODY;.... VARIABLES x,y,... CONCRETE_VARIABLES cv,cw,... INVARIANT P (logical predicate) ASSERTIONS P;...;P (list of logical predicates separated by ;) INITIALISATION OPERATIONS
USES list of machines INCLUDES list of machines SEES list of machines EXTENDS list of machines PROMOTES list of operations REFINES machine
Note: Refinement machines should express the operation preconditions in terms of their own variables.
NAME1 == Expression; Definition without arguments NAME2(ID,...,ID) == E2; Definition with arguments
"FILE.def"; Include definitions from file
There are a few Definitions which can be used to influence the animator:
There are a few specific definitions which can be used to influence ProB: GOAL == P to define a custom Goal predicate for Model Checking (the Goal is also set by using "Advanced Find...") SCOPE == P to limit the search space to "interesting" nodes scope_SETNAME == n..n to define custom cardinality for set SETNAME scope_SETNAME == n equivalent to 1..n SET_PREF_MININT == n SET_PREF_MAXINT == n SET_PREF_MAX_INITIALISATIONS == n max. number of intialisations computed SET_PREF_MAX_OPERATIONS == n max. number of enablings per operation computed SET_PREF_SYMBOLIC == TRUE/FALSE SET_PREF_TIME_OUT == n time out for operation computation in ms ASSERT_LTL... == "LTL Formula" using X,F,G,U,R LTL operators + Y,O,H,S Past-LTL operators + atomic propositions: e(OpName), [OpName], {BPredicate}
The following definitions allow providing a custom state visualization:
ANIMATION_FUNCTIONn == e a function (INT*INT) +-> INT or an INT ANIMATION_FUNCTION_DEFAULT == e a function (INT*INT) +-> INT or an INT instead of any INT above you can also use BOOL or any SET as a result you can also use STRING values, or even other values which are pretty printed ANIMATION_IMGn == "PATH to .gif" a path to a gif file ANIMATION_STRn == "sometext" a string without spaces; the result integer n will be rendered as a string ANIMATION_STR_JUSTIFY_LEFT == TRUE computes the longest string in the outputs and pads the other strings accordingly SET_PREF_TK_CUSTOM_STATE_VIEW_PADDING == n additional padding between images in pixels SET_PREF_TK_CUSTOM_STATE_VIEW_STRING_PADDING == n additional padding between text in pixels
The following definitions allow providing a custom state graph:
CUSTOM_GRAPH_NODESn == e define a set of nodes to be shown, nodes can also be pairs (Node,Colour), triples (Node,Shape,Colour) or records rec(color:Colour, shape:Shape, style:Style, label:Label, value:Node) Colours are strings of valid Dot/Tk colors (e.g., "maroon" or "red") Shapes are strings of valid Dot shapes (e.g., "rect" or "hexagon"), and Styles are valid Dot shape styles (e.g., "rounded" or "solid" or "dashed") CUSTOM_GRAPH_EDGESn == e define a relation to be shown as a graph edges can either be pairs (node1,node2) or triples (node1,Label,node2) where Label is either a Dot/Tk color or a string or value representing the label to be used for the edges
In both cases e can also be a record which defines default dot attributes like color, shape, style and description, e.g.:
CUSTOM_GRAPH_NODES == rec(color:"blue", shape:"rect", nodes:e); CUSTOM_GRAPH_EDGES == rec(color:"red", style:"dotted", edges:e)
Alternatively, the complete graph can be put into one definition using CUSTOM_GRAPH
.
There are also definitions for generating UML sequence charts.
These DEFINITIONS affect VisB:
VISB_JSON_FILE == "PATH to .json" a path to a default VisB JSON file for visualisation; if it is "" an empty SVG will be created VISB_SVG_OBJECTSn == define a record or set of records for creating new SVG objects VISB_SVG_UPDATESn == define a record or set of records containing updates of SVG objects VISB_SVG_HOVERSn == define a record or set of records for VisB hover functions VISB_SVG_BOX == record with dimensions (height, width) of a default empty SVG VISB_SVG_CONTENTS == defines a string to be included into a created empty SVG file
B supports two styles of comments: /* ... */ block comments // ... line comments
ProB recognises several pragma comments of the form /*@ PRAGMA VALUE */ The whitespace between @ and PRAGMA is optional.
/*@symbolic */ put before comprehension set or lambda to instruct ProB to keep it symbolic and not try to compute it explicitly /*@label LBL */ associates a label LBL with the following predicate (LBL must be identifier or a string "....") /*@desc DESC */ associates a description DESC with the preceding predicate or introduced identifier (in VARIABLES, CONSTANTS,... section) There are two special descriptions /*@desc memo*/ to be put after identifiers in the ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS section indicating that these functions should be memoized /*@desc prob-ignore */ to be put after predicates (e.g., in PROPERTIES) which should be ignored by ProB when the preference USE_IGNORE_PRAGMAS is TRUE /*@file PATH */ associates a file for machines in SEES, INCLUDES, ... put pragma after a seen or included machine /*@package NAME */ at start of machine, machine file should be in folder NAME/... NAME can be qualified N1.N2...Nk, in which case the machine file should be in N1/N2/.../Nk /*@import-package NAME */ adds ../NAME to search paths for SEES,... NAME can also be qualified N1.N2...Nk, use after package pragma /*@generated */ can be put at the top of a machine file; indicates the machine is generated from some other source and should not be edited
.mch for abstract machine files .ref for refinement machines .imp for implementation machines .def for DEFINITIONS files .rmch for Rules machines for data validation
More information can be found here.
Free types exist in Z and in the Rodin theory plugin and are supported by ProB. You can also define new free types in classical B by adding a FREETYPES clause with free type definitions separated by semicolon.
Here is a definition of an inductive type IntList for lists of integers constructed using inil and icons:
FREETYPES IntList = inil, icons(INTEGER*IntList)
Basically, ProB tries to be compatible with Atelier B and conforms to the semantics of Abrial's B-Book and of Atelier B's reference manual. Here are the main differences with Atelier B:
- tuples without parentheses are not supported; write (a,b,c) instead of a,b,c - relational composition has to be wrapped into parentheses; write (f;g) - parallel product also has to be wrapped into parentheses; write (f||g) - not all tree operators are supported - the VALUES clause is only partially supported - definitions have to be syntactically correct and be either an expression, predicate or substitution; the arguments to definitions have to be expressions; definitions which are predicates or substitutions must be declared before first use - definitions are local to a machine - for ProB the order of fields in a record is not relevant (internally the fields are sorted), Atelier-B reports a type error if the order of the name of the fields changes - well-definedness: for disjunctions and implications ProB uses the L-system of well-definedness (i.e., for P => Q, P should be well-defined and if P is true then Q should also be well-defined) - ProB allows WHILE loops and sequential composition in abstract machines - ProB now allows the IF-THEN-ELSE and LET for expressions and predicates (e.g., IF x<0 THEN -x ELSE x END or LET x BE x=f(y) IN x+x END) - ProB's type inference is stronger than Atelier-B's, much less typing predicates are required - ProB accepts operations with parameters but without pre-conditions - ProB allows identifiers consisting of a single character and identifiers in single backquotes (`id`) - ProB allows to use <> for the empty sequence (but this use is deprecated) - ProB allows escape codes (\n, \', \", see above) and supports UTF-8 characters in strings, and ProB allows multi-line string literals written using three apostrophes ('''string''') as well as template strings using three backquotes (e.g., ```1+2=${1+2}```) - ProB allows a she-bang line in machine files starting with #! (If you discover more differences, please let us know!) - ProB allows btrue and bfalse as predicates in B machines - ProB allows to use the Event-B relation operators <<->, <->>, <<->> - ProB allows set comprehensions with an extra expression like {x•x:1..10|x*x}. - The FREETYPES section and the external libraries (LibraryStrings.def, ...) do not exist in Atelier-B
See also our Wiki for documentation:
Also note that there are various differences between BToolkit and AtelierB/ProB:
- AtelierB/ProB do not allow true as predicate; e.g., PRE true THEN ... END is not allowed (use BEGIN ... END instead), ProB allows btrue as predicate. - AtelierB/ProB do not allow a machine parameter to be used in the PROPERTIES - AtelierB/ProB require a scalar machine parameter to be typed in the CONSTRAINTS clause - In AtelierB/ProB the BOOL type is pre-defined and cannot be redefined
ProB is best at treating universally quantified formulas of the form !x.(x:SET => RHS), or !(x,y).(x|->y:SET =>RHS), !(x,y,z).(x|->y|->z:SET =>RHS), ...; otherwise the treatment of !(x1,...,xn).(LHS => RHS) may delay until all values treated by LHS are known. Similarly, expressions of the form SIGMA(x).(x:SET|Expr) and PI(x).(x:SET|Expr) lead to better constraint propagation. The construction S:FIN(S) is recognised by ProB as equivalent to the Event-B finite(S) operator. ProB assumes that machines and STRING values are encoded using UTF-8.
Please help us to improve this documentation by providing feedback in our bug tracker, asking questions in our prob-users group or sending an email to Michael Leuschel.
Warning This page has not yet been reviewed. Parts of it may no longer be up to date |
ProB requires all constants and variables to be typed. As of version 1.3, ProB uses a new unification-based type inference and checking algorithm. As such, you should be able to use most Atelier B models without problem. On the other hand, certain models that ProB accepts will have to be rewritten to be type checked by Atelier B (e.g., by adding additional typing predicates). Also note that, in contrast to Atelier B, ProB will type check macro DEFINITIONS.
Generally speaking, any constant or variable. More precisely:
ProB will warn you if a variable has not been given a type.
HINT: The Analyse|Show Typing command reveals the typing that ProB has inferred for your constants and global variables.
Animating and verifying a B specification is in principle undecidable. ProB overcomes this by requiring that the domain of the variables is finite (i.e., with finitely many values) or integer. This ensures that the state space has finite size. Typing of the B specification ensures this restriction.
In the B specification, a set is either defined explicitely, thus being a finite domain, or its definition is deferred. In the later case, the user can indicate the size of the set mySET (without defining its elements) by creating a macro in the DEFINITIONS clause with the name scope_mySET and an integer value (e.g. scope_mySET==2) or a value specified as a range (e.g. scope_mySET == 1..12). The macros with the prefix "scope_" will be used by ProB and do not modify the B specification. If the size of the set is unspecified, ProB considers the set to have a default size. The value for the default size is defined in the Preferences|Animation Preferences... preference window by the preference Size of unspecified sets in SETS section.
The B method enables to specify the size of a set with the card operator in the PROPERTIES clause; this form of constraint is now supported by ProB, provided it is of a simple form card(S)=Nr, where S is a deferred set and Nr a natural number.
The typing information is used by ProB to enumerate the possible values of a constant or a variable whenever a specification does not narrow down that value to a single value.
For example, if you write xx:NAT & xx=1 ProB does not have to resort to enumeration as the xx=1 constraint imposes a single possible value for xx. However, if you write xx:NAT & xx<3 ProB will enumerate the possible values of xx in order to find those that satisfy the constraints imposed by the machine (here 0,1,2).
ProB will use the constraints to try to cut down the enumeration space, and will resort to enumeration usually only as a last resort. So something like xx:NAT & xx<10 & x>2 & x=5 will not result in enumeration.
The enumeration range for integers is controlled by two preferences in the Preferences|Animation Preferences... preference window: !MinInt, used for expressions such as xx::INT, and !MaxInt, used for expressions such as xx::NAT preferences. Nevertheless, writing xx: NAT & xx = 55 puts the value 55 in x no matter what !MaxInt is set to, as no enumeration is required.
Note that these preferences also apply to the mathematical integers (INTEGER) and natural numbers (NATURAL). In case a mathematical integer or natural number is enumerated (using !MinInt and !MaxInt) a warning is printed on the console.
A deferred set in B is declared in the SETS Section and is not explicitly enumerated. In the example below, AA is a deferred set and BB is an enumerated set.
MACHINE M0 SETS AA; BB={bb,cc,dd} END
ProB in general requires all deferred sets to be given a finite cardinality before starting animation or model checking. If no cardinality is specified, a default size will be used (which is controlled by the DEFAULT_SETSIZE preference).
In general (for both probcli and ProB Tcl/Tk) you can set the cardinality of a set AA either by
- card(AA) > 1 - aa:AA & bb:AA & aa/=bb - AA = {aa,bb} & aa/=bb - …
Note: instead of adding AA = {aa,bb} to the SETS clause you can also add AA = {aa,bb} & aa/=bb to the PROPERTIES clause. This can also be done in a refinement. A good idea is then to generate a refinement for animation with ProB (which may contain other important settings for animation):
REFINEMENT M0_ProB REFINES M0 CONSTANTS aa,bb PROPERTIES AA = {aa,bb} & aa/=bb END
From the command-line, using probcli you can use the command-line switch:
-card <GS> <VAL>
Example:
probcli my.mch -card PID 5
Free types exist in Z and in the Rodin theory plugin and are supported by ProB. You can also define new free types in classical B by adding a FREETYPES clause with free type definitions separated by semicolon.
Here is a definition of an inductive type IntList for lists of integers constructed using inil and icons:
FREETYPES IntList = inil, icons(INTEGER*IntList)
Free types are sum types [1]. They make it easier to define recursive structures. A free type value may take exactly one of the defined subtypes, with additional payload data, and later the exact subtype can be queried and the payload data retrieved.
The FREETYPES machine clause contains a semicolon separated list of Freetype Definitions:
FREETYPES <Freetype Definition 1>; ...; <Freetype Definition N>
Each Freetype Definition consists of an identifier (the name of the free type), followed by an equals symbol and one or more Freetype Constructors separated by commas:
<Identifier> = <Freetype Constructor 1>, ..., <Freetype Constructor N>
A Freetype Constructor may be a single identifier (the name of the free type constructor) or an identifier with a single expression argument (the type of the payload data) in parentheses.
<Identifier> <Identifier>(<Expression>)
The name of the free type can be used anywhere in the machine as a type identifier (like a set) to define the type of a value.
To actually create a value of the free type one needs to use one of the free type constructors. Free type constructors that do not take an argument can be used as the right side of an assignment as-is, while free type constructors that have an argument need a value parameter of that type - this works like a function call. Because those constructor calls work like function calls, we benefit from the tuple-function syntactic sugar and can use one tuple parameter as a way to represent multiple logical parameters and call the constructor with values separated by commas without having to create a tuple first.
Internally constructors without parameter are just values, while constructors with parameters are functions that take the payload data and return the free type value with the given payload. To check whether a free type value has a specific subtype one can use equality for parameter-less constructors and membership in the range for constructors with a parameter.
To get the contained value out of a free type value one can use the inverse constructor (also called deconstructor), simply created by applying the B operator ~.
In our example from the introduction we have a free type with two constructors that represents a list. The constructor inil represents an empty list and takes no argument, while the icons constructor represents a list head with the first value and the rest of the list combined as a tuple.
To create a list with content we are using the simplified function call syntax, so we do not have to construct the tuple (head, tail) directly.
To get values out of the icons subtype we use the the deconstructor icons~. The resulting value is a tuple which we need to project to the first or second value respectively.
Here we implement a stack:
MACHINE IntListTest FREETYPES IntList = inil, icons(INTEGER*IntList) VARIABLES list INVARIANT list : IntList INITIALISATION list := inil OPERATIONS push(value) = PRE value : INTEGER THEN list := icons(value, list) END; pop = PRE list /= inil THEN list := prj2(icons~(list)) END; value <-- peek = PRE list : ran(icons) THEN value := prj1(icons~(list)) END END
Example usage in ProB2-UI:
As of version 1.3.5-beta7 ProB can make use of externally defined functions. These functions must currently be written in Prolog (in principle C, Java, Tcl or even other languages can be used via the SICStus Prolog external function interfaces). These functions can be used to write expression, predicates, or substitutions. The general mechanism that is used is to mark certain DEFINITIONS as external, in which case ProB will make use of external Prolog code rather than using the right-hand-side of the DEFINITION whenever it is used. However, these DEFINITIONS can often (unless they are polymorphic) be wrapped into B (constant) functions. If you just want to use the standard external functions already defined by ProB, then you don't have to understand this mechanism in detail (or at all).
We have a PDF describing the external functions generated from a ProB-Jupyter notebook: File:ExternalFunctions.pdf The Notebook is available and can now be launched via binder.
In a first instance we have predefined a series of external functions and grouped them in various library machines and definition files:
Since version 1.5 the standard library is shipped with ProB and references to machines and DEFINITION-files in the standard library are resolved automatically when referenced (see PROBPATH for information about how to customize the lookup path).
To use a library machine you can use the SEES mechanism:
SEES LibraryMath
Note that for rules machines (.rmch) you have to use REFERENCES instead.
In general you can do the following with an external function, such as sin, wrapped into a constant:
To use a library definition file, you need to include the file in the DEFINITIONS clause:
DEFINITIONS "LibraryIO.def"
Currently, external functions are linked to classical B machines using B DEFINITIONS as follows:
Usually, it is also a good idea to encapsulate the external function inside a CONSTANT which is defined as a lambda abstraction with as body simply the call to the first DEFINITION. For COS this would be cos = %x.(x:NATURAL|COS(x)). Observe that for Atelier-B this is a tautology. For ProB, the use of such a constant allows one to have a real B function representing the external function, for which we can compute the domain, range, etc.
For the typing of an external function NAME with type TYPE there are three possibilities, depending on whether the function is a function, a predicate or a substitution:
In case the external function is polymorphic, the DEFINITION can take extra arguments: each argument is treated like a type variable. For example, the following is used in CHOOSE.def to declare the Hilbert choice operator:
Take the following function:
CONSTANTS parity PROPERTIES parity : (NATURAL --> {0,1}) & parity(0) = 0 & !x.(x:NATURAL => parity(x+1) = 1 - parity(x))
Here, ProB will complain that it cannot find a solution for parity. The reason is that parity is a function over an infinite domain, but ProB tries to represent the function as a finite set of maplets.
There are basically four solutions to this problem:
parity : (NAT --> {0,1}) & parity(0) = 0 & !x.(x:NAT & x<MAXINT => parity(x+1) = 1 - parity(x))
parity : (NATURAL --> {0,1}) & parity(0) = 0 & !x.(x:NATURAL1 => parity(x) = 1 - parity(x-1))
parity : INTEGER <-> INTEGER & parity = {0|->0} \/ %x.(x:NATURAL1|1-parity(x-1))
Note, you have to remove the check parity : (NATURAL --> {0,1}), as this will currently cause expansion of the recursive function. We describe this new scheme in more detail below.
parity : (NATURAL --> INTEGER) & parity = %x.(x:NATURAL|x mod 2)
You can experiment with those by using the Eval console of ProB, experimenting for example with the following complete machine. Note, you should use ProB 1.3.5-beta2 or higher.
(You can also type expressions and predicates such as parity = %x.(x:NATURAL|x mod 2) & parity[1..10] = res directly into the online version of the Eval console).
MACHINE InfiniteParityFunction CONSTANTS parity PROPERTIES parity : NATURAL --> INTEGER & parity = %x.(x:NATURAL|x mod 2) VARIABLES c INVARIANT c: NATURAL INITIALISATION c:=0 OPERATIONS Inc = BEGIN c:=c+1 END; r <-- Parity = BEGIN r:= parity(c) END; r <-- ParityImage = BEGIN r:= parity[0..c] END; r <-- ParityHistory = BEGIN r:= (%i.(i:1..c+1|i-1) ; parity) END END
You may also want to look at the tutorial page on modeling infinite datatypes.
Currently there are four cases when ProB tries to keep a function such as f = %x.(PRED|E) symbolically rather than computing an explicit representation:
As of version 1.3.5-beta7 ProB now accepts recursively defined functions. For this:
Here is a full example:
MACHINE Parity ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS parity PROPERTIES parity : INTEGER <-> INTEGER & parity = {0|->0} \/ %x.(x:NATURAL1|1-parity(x-1)) END
As of version 1.6.1 you can also use IF-THEN-ELSE and LET constructs in the body of a recursive function. The above example can for example now be written as:
MACHINE ParityIFTE ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS parity PROPERTIES parity : INTEGER <-> INTEGER & parity = %x.(x:NATURAL|IF x=0 THEN 0 ELSE 1-parity(x-1)END) END
With such a recursive function you can:
Also, you have to be careful to avoid accidentally expanding these functions. For example, trying to check parity : INTEGER <-> INTEGER or parity : INTEGER +-> INTEGER will cause older version of ProB to try and expand the function. ProB 1.6.1 can actually check parity:NATURAL --> INTEGER, but it cannot check parity:NATURAL --> 0..1.
There are the following further restrictions:
As of version 1.9.0-beta9 ProB allows you to annotate functions in the ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS section for memoization. Memoization is a technique for storing results of function applications and reusing the result if possible to avoid re-computing the function for the same arguments again.
To enable memoization you either need to
Take the following example:
MACHINE MemoizationTests ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS fib /*@desc memo */, fact /*@desc memo */ PROPERTIES fib = %x.(x:NATURAL | (IF x=0 or x=1 THEN 1 ELSE fib(x-1)+fib(x-2) END)) & fact = %x.(x:NATURAL|(IF x=0 THEN 1 ELSE x*fact(x-1) END)) ASSERTIONS fib(30)=1346269; fib[28..30] = {514229,832040,1346269}; 30|->1346269 : fib; 30|->1346268 /: fib; {x| 30|->x:fib} = {1346269}; END
Memoization means that the recursive Fibonacci function now runs in linear time rather than in exponential time. Generally, memoization is useful for functions which are complex to compute but which are called repeatedly with the same arguments.
As can be seen above, memoization is active for
The following points are relevant:
With the command-line version probcli you can use the -profile command to obtain some statistics about memoization. An example output is the following one:
-------------------------- ProB profile info after 9670 ms walltime (7217 ms runtime) No source profiling information available Recompile ProB with -Dprob_src_profile=true No profiling information available Recompile ProB with -Dprob_profile=true MEMO Table: Summary of reuse per memoization ID: MemoID 1 (prime) : Values Stored: 999 (? ms to compute), Reused ? MemoID 2 (fib) : Values Stored: 31 (? ms to compute), Reused ? MemoID 3 (fact) : Values Stored: 11 (? ms to compute), Reused ? MemoID 4 (evenupto) : Values Stored: 0 (? ms to compute), Reused ? MemoID 5 (sum) : Values Stored: 1001 (? ms to compute), Reused ? MemoID 6 (M91) : Values Stored: 111 (? ms to compute), Reused ? Hashes computed: 1002, expansions reused: 0 Memoization functions registered: 6, results reused: 1345
If the compile time flag -Dprob_profile=true is set, the output is more detailed:
... MEMO Table: Summary of reuse per memoization ID: MemoID 1 (prime) : Values Stored: 999 (336 ms to compute), Reused 1003 MemoID 2 (fib) : Values Stored: 31 (20 ms to compute), Reused 45 MemoID 3 (fact) : Values Stored: 11 (10 ms to compute), Reused 1 MemoID 4 (evenupto) : Values Stored: 0 (0 ms to compute), Reused 0 MemoID 5 (sum) : Values Stored: 1001 (16659 ms to compute), Reused 1 MemoID 6 (M91) : Values Stored: 111 (15 ms to compute), Reused 295 Hashes computed: 1002, expansions reused: 0 Memoization functions registered: 6, results reused: 1345
In verbose mode (-v flag for probcli) you also obtain information about individual stored results.
MEMO Table: MemoID 1 stored FUNCTION prime : %x.(x : NATURAL|(IF !y.(y : 2 .. x - 1 => x mod y /= 0) THEN TRUE ELSE FALSE END)) MemoID 2 stored FUNCTION fib : %x.(x : NATURAL|(IF x : {0,1} THEN 1 ELSE MEMOIZE_STORED_FUNCTION(2)(x - 1) + MEMOIZE_STORED_FUNCTION(2)(x - 2) END)) ... MemoID 6 stored FUNCTION M91 : %x.(x : INTEGER|(IF x > 100 THEN x - 10 ELSE MEMOIZE_STORED_FUNCTION(6)(MEMOIZE_STORED_FUNCTION(6)(x + 11)) END)) MemoID 1 (prime) result for argument 13 : TRUE MemoID 1 (prime) result for argument 14 : FALSE MemoID 1 (prime) result for argument 2 : TRUE MemoID 1 (prime) result for argument 3 : TRUE ... Memoization functions registered: 6, results reused: 1345
Also have a look at Tips:_Writing_Models_for_ProB.
Classical B only has a LET substitution, no let construct for predicates or expressions. Event-B has no let construct whatsoever.
Since version 1.6.1-beta (28th of April 2016), ProB supports the use of the LET substitution syntax in expressions and predicates.
>>> LET a BE a = 10 IN a + 10 END Expression Value = 20
>>> LET a BE a=10 IN a END + 10 Expression Value = 20
>>> LET a BE a=10 IN a END = 10 Predicate is TRUE
>>> LET a BE a = 10 IN a < 10 END Predicate is FALSE
>>> LET a BE a=10 IN a /= 10 END or 1=1 Predicate is TRUE
>>> LET a, b BE a = 10 & b = 1 IN a + b END Expression Value = 11
For predicates this encodes a let predicate:
#x.(x=E & P)
corresponds to something like
let x=E in P
Within set comprehensions one can use the following construct:
dom({x,y|y=E & P})
corresponds to something like
{x|let y=E in P}
One can also use the ran operator or introduce multiple lets in one go:
dom(dom({x,y,z|y=E1 & z=E2 &P}))
or
ran({y,z,x|y=E1 & z=E2 &P})
both encode
{x|let y=E1 & z=E2 in P}
In case F is a set expression, then the following construct can be used to encode a let statement:
UNION(x).(x=E|F)
corresponds to something like
let x=E in F
The following construct has exactly the same effect:
INTER(x).(x=E|F)
Classical B only has an IF-THEN-ELSE substitution (aka statement), no such construct for predicates or expressions.
Since version 1.6.1-beta (28th of April 2016), ProB supports the use of the LET substitution syntax in expressions and predicates.
>>> IF 1 = 1 THEN 3 ELSE 4 END Expression Value = 3
>>> IF 1 = 1 THEN 3 ELSE 4 END + 5 Expression Value = 8
>>> IF 1=1 THEN TRUE = FALSE ELSE TRUE=TRUE END Predicate is FALSE
>>> IF 1=1 THEN TRUE = FALSE ELSE TRUE=TRUE END or 1=1 Predicate is TRUE
The following construct
%((x).(x=0 & PRED|C1)\/%(x).(x=0 & not(PRED)|C2)) (0)
encodes an if-then-else for expressions:
IF PRED THEN C1 ELSE C2 END
The former lambda-construct is recognised by ProB and replaced internally by an if-then-else construct. The latter syntax is actually now recognised as well by ProB 1.6 (version 1.6.0 still requires parentheses around the IF-THEN-ELSE; version 1.6.1 no longer requires them).
In classical B there is no counterpart to the Event-B finite operator. However, the following construct has the same effect as finite(x) (and is recognised by ProB):
x : FIN(x)
One can encode the fact that n objects x1,...,xn are pair-wise different using the following construct (recognised by ProB):
card({x1,...,xn})=n
Given a function f and a sequence sqce one can map the function over all elements of sqce using the relational composition operator ;:
(sqce ; f)
For example, ([1,2,3] ; succ) gives us the sequence [2,3,4].
Even though B has no built-in support for recursion, one can use the transitive closure operator closure1 to compute certain recursive functions. For this we need to encode the recursion as a step function of the form:
%(in,acc).(P|(inr,accr))
where P is a predicate which in case we have not yet reached a base case for the input value in. The computation result has to be stored in an accumulator: acc is the accumulator before the recursion step, accr after. inr is the new input value for the recursive call. In case the base case is reached for in, the predicate P should be false and the value of the recursive call should be the value of the accumulator.
The value of the recursive function can thus be obtained by calling:
closure1(step)[{(in,ia)}](b)
where in is the input value, b is the base case and ia is the initial (empty) accumulator.
For example, to sort a set of integers into a ascending sequence, we would define the step function as follows:
step = %(s,o).(s/={} | (s\{min(s)},o<-min(s)))
A particular call would be:
closure1(step)[{({4,5,2},[])}]({})
resulting in the sequence [2,4,5].
Observe that, even though closure1(step) is an infinite relation, ProB can compute the relational image of closure1(step) for a particular set such as {({4,5,2},[])} (provided the recursion terminates).
Recursive functions can be declared using the ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS section in B machines. Functions declared as ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS are treated symbolically by ProB and not evaluated eagerly.
For example, to sort a set of integers into a ascending sequence, as above, we would define a recursive function as follows:
ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS Recursive_Sort PROPERTIES Recursive_Sort : POW(INTEGER) <-> POW(INTEGER*INTEGER) & Recursive_Sort = %in.(in : POW(INTEGER) & in = {} | []) \/ %in.(in : POW(INTEGER) & in /= {} | min(in) -> Recursive_Sort(in\{min(in)}))
By defining Recursive_Sort as an abstract constant we indicate that ProB should handle the function symbolically, i.e. ProB will not try to enumerate all elements of the function. The recursive function itself is composed of two single functions: a function defining the base case and a function defining the recursive case. Note, that the intersection of the domains of these function is empty, and hence, the union is still a function.
The most common issue is that ProB needs to find values for the constants which satisfy the properties (aka axioms in Event-B). You should read the tutorial pages on this (in particular Understanding the ProB Setup Phases and Tutorial Troubleshooting the Setup)
Existential quantifiers can pose subtle problems when solving constraint problems.
For an existential quantifier #x.P ProB will often wait until all variables in P apart from x are known to evaluate the quantifier. Indeed, if all variables apart from x are known, ProB can stop when it finds one solution for x. Take for example:
#x.(x:0..1000 & x=p) & p:101..104
Here, ProB will wait until p is known (e.g., 101) before enumerating possible values for x. However, it could be that the predicate P is required to instantiate the outside variable, as in this example:
#x.(x:100..101 & x=p) & p:NATURAL
Here, the existential quantifier is required to narrow down the possible values of p. Thus, before enumerating an unbounded variable, ProB will start enumerating the existential variable x. Note, however, that the priority with which it will be enumerated is much lower than if it was a regular variable! Hence:
One exception to the above treatment are existential quantifiers of the form #x.(x=E & P). They are recognised by ProB as LET-PREDICATES. This is a good use of the existential quantifier. This quantifier will never "block".
The situation is very similar to the existential quantifier. In the worst case ProB may delay evaluating a universal quantifier !x.(P=>Q) until all variables in P are known so as to be able to determine all values of x for which Q has to be checked.
There are a few optimisations:
Tip: sometimes one can force expansion of a quantifier by using two implications. E.g., suppose we know that the domain of s is a subset of 1..10, then we can rewrite !x.(s(x)=5 => P(x) into !x.(x:1..10 => (s(x)=5 => P(x)). This will ensure that the quantifier is checked
Classical B contains the transitive closure operator closure1. It is not available by default in Event-B, and axiomatisations of it may be very difficult to treat by ProB. Indeed, if you define the transitive closure in Event-B as a function tclos from relations to relations, ProB will try to find a value for tclos. The search space for this function is (2^n*n)^(2^n*n), where n is the size of the base set (see Tutorial Understanding the Complexity of B Animation). For n=3 this is already way too big too handle (the search space has 1.40e+1387 relations).
Hence, in Event-B, you should use a theory of the transitive closure which contains a special mapping file which instructs ProB to use the classical B operator. See the page on supporting Event-B theories along with the links to theories that can be used efficiently with ProB.
There are various ways in which you can debug your model. We focus here on debugging performance issues
The standard library "LibraryIO.def" contains various external functions and predicates with which you can instrument your formal model.
To use the library in your model you need to include the following
DEFINITIONS "LibraryIO.def"
With the external predicate printf you can view values of variables and identifiers. The printf predicate is always true and will print its arguments when all of them have been fully computed. The printf predicate uses the format from SICStus Prolog for the format string. The most important are ~w for printing an argument and ~n for a newline. There must be exactly as many ~w in the format string as there are aguments. Below is a small example, to inspect in which order ProB enumerates values. The example is typed in the REPL of probcli (started using the command probcli -repl File.mch where File.mch includes the definitions section above):
>>> {x,y | x:1..5 & y:1..2 & x+y=6 & printf("x=~w~n",[x]) & printf("y=~w~n",[y])} y=1 x=5 y=2 x=4 Expression Value = {(4|->2),(5|->1)}
As you can see, ProB has enumerated y before x, as its domain was smaller.
You can use the external function observe to inspect a list of identifiers:
>>> {x,y | x:1..5 & y:1..2 & x+y=6 & observe((x,y))} observing x observing y y = 1 (walltime: 562188 ms) . x = 5 (walltime: 562188 ms) ..* Value complete: x |-> y = (5|->1) (walltime: 562188 ms) ------ y = 2 (walltime: 562188 ms) . x = 4 (walltime: 562188 ms) ..* Value complete: x |-> y = (4|->2) (walltime: 562188 ms) ------ Expression Value = {(4|->2),(5|->1)}
With the external function TIME you can get the current time in seconds:
>>> TIME("sec") Expression Value = 11 >>> TIME("now") Expression Value = 1581432376 >>> TIME("now") Expression Value = 1581432377
With the external function DELTA_WALLTIME you can get the time in milliseconds since the last call to DELTA_WALLTIME.
By setting the preference PERFORMANCE_INFO to TRUE ProB will print various performance messages. For example it may print messages when the evaluation of comprehension sets has exceeded a threshold. This threshold (in ms) can be influenced by setting the preference PERFORMANCE_INFO_LIMIT.
By setting the preference TRACE_INFO to TRUE ProB will print additional messages when evaluating certain predicates, in particular the PROPERTIES clause of a B machine. With this feature you can observe how constants get bound to values and can sometimes spot expensive predicates and large values. Some additional information about debugging the PROPERTIES can be found in the Tutorial Troubleshooting the Setup.
Let us take the following machine
MACHINE Debug CONSTANTS a,b,c PROPERTIES a = card(b) & b = %x.(x:1..c|x*x) & c : 1000..1001 & c < 1001 VARIABLES x INVARIANT x:NATURAL INITIALISATION x:=2 OPERATIONS Sqr = SELECT x:dom(b) THEN x := b(x) END; Finished = SELECT x /: dom(b) THEN skip END END
Here is how we can debug the constants setup:
$ probcli Debug.mch -p TRACE_INFO TRUE -init % unused_constants(2,[a,c]) nr_of_components(1) ====> (1) c < 1001 ====> (1) a = card(b) ====> (1) b = %x.(x : 1 .. c|x * x) ====> (1) c : 1000 .. 1001 finished_processing_component_predicates grounding_wait_flags :?: a int(?:0..sup) :?: b VARIABLE: _31319 : GRVAL-CHECK :?: c int(?:inf..1000) --1-->> a int(1000) --1-->> b AVL.size=1000 --1-->> c int(1000) % Runtime for SOLUTION for SETUP_CONSTANTS: 107 ms (walltime: 110 ms) % Runtime to FINALISE SETUP_CONSTANTS: 0 ms (walltime: 0 ms) =INIT=> x := 2 [=OK= 0 ms]
Indeed, for performance it can be much more efficient to expand a value (such as a function or relation) once, rather than keeping it symbolic. On the other, expanding a very large set can be costly in terms of memory. A useful feature to analyse these issues is the constants_analysis command. It generates a CSV table which can be inspected in an editor or a spreadsheet program. The table provides an overview of the constants, in particular their size and whether they are kept symbolic or expanded.
Note that B distinguishes between abstract and concrete constants. By default, concrete constants will be evaluated (unless they are known to be infinite or larger or annotated as symbolic). Abstract constants are more often kept symbolic. You can influence ProB's treatmen of constants by - choosing to put constants into the ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS or CONCRETE_CONSTANTS section - annotating the values with the /*@ symbolic */ pragma - annotating the constant with the /@ desc expand */ pragma to force expansion - annotating the constant with the /@desc memo */ pragma to memoize its evaluation (i.e., cache evaluation results involving the constant)
Let us examine this machine, where the constants a1,a2,a3 are identical to c1,c2,c3 but are located in the abstract rather than the concrete constants section:
MACHINE DebugSymbolicConstants ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS a1, a2, a3 CONCRETE_CONSTANTS c1, c2, c3 PROPERTIES a1 = %x.(x:1..10000|x+x) & a2 = {x | x:1..10000 & x mod 100 = 0} & a3 = %x.(x:1..100|x*x) & c1 = %x.(x:1..10000|x+x) & c2 = {x | x:1..10000 & x mod 100 = 0} & c3 = %x.(x:1..100|x*x) END
The command can now be run as follows. Here the output is written to the console (by providing user_output as file name). The list of constants is sorted according to size.
probcli DebugSymbolicConstants.mch -init -csv constants_analysis user_output ... Calling table command constants_analysis ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Abstract constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 10000 (by moving to ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS or annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): a1 ! Line: 3 Column: 2 until Line: 3 Column: 4 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants.mch ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Abstract constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 100 (by moving to ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS or annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): a2 ! Line: 3 Column: 6 until Line: 3 Column: 8 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants.mch ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Abstract constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 100 (by moving to ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS or annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): a3 ! Line: 3 Column: 10 until Line: 3 Column: 12 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants.mch CONSTANT class kind termsize value c1 CONCRETE AVL-Set:10000 90002 #10000:{(1|->2),(2|->4),...,(9999|->19998),(10000|->20000)} c3 CONCRETE AVL-Set:100 902 {(1|->1),(2|->4),(3|->9),(4|->16),(5|->25),(6|->36),(7|->49),(8|->64),(9|->81),(10|->100),(11|->121)... a3 ABSTRACT FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:100 708 /*@symbolic*/ %x.(x : {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29... c2 CONCRETE AVL-Set:100 602 {100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900,1000,1100,1200,1300,1400,1500,1600,1700,1800,1900,2000,2100,220... a2 ABSTRACT FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:100 162 /*@symbolic*/ {x|x : (1 .. 10000) & x mod 100 = 0} a1 ABSTRACT FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:10000 151 /*@symbolic*/ %x.(x : (1 .. 10000)|x + x) Finished exporting constants_analysis to user_output
Let us now add pragmas to study their influence:
MACHINE DebugSymbolicConstants_pragmas ABSTRACT_CONSTANTS a1 /*@desc expand*/, a2 /*@desc expand*/, a3 /*@desc expand*/ CONCRETE_CONSTANTS c1 /*@desc memo */, c2, c3 PROPERTIES a1 = %x.(x:1..10000|x+x) & a2 = {x | x:1..10000 & x mod 100 = 0} & a3 = %x.(x:1..100|x*x) & c1 = /*@symbolic */ %x.(x:1..10000|x+x) & c2 = /*@symbolic */ {x | x:1..10000 & x mod 100 = 0} & c3 = /*@symbolic */ %x.(x:1..100|x*x) END
You can see that a1,a2 and a3 are expanded, while c1, c2 and c3 kept symbolic.
probcli DebugSymbolicConstants_pragmas.mch -init -csv constants_analysis user_output ... Calling table command constants_analysis ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Concrete constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 10000 (by annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): c1 ! Line: 5 Column: 2 until Line: 5 Column: 4 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants_pragmas.mch ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Concrete constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 100 (by annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): c2 ! Line: 5 Column: 22 until Line: 5 Column: 24 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants_pragmas.mch ! Message (source: constants_analysis): ! Concrete constant is stored symbolically but can be expanded to a finite set of size 100 (by annotating with /*@desc expand */ pragma): c3 ! Line: 5 Column: 26 until Line: 5 Column: 28 in file: /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tester/ConstantsDebug/DebugSymbolicConstants_pragmas.mch CONSTANT class kind termsize value a1 ABSTRACT AVL-Set:10000 90002 #10000:{(1|->2),(2|->4),...,(9999|->19998),(10000|->20000)} a3 ABSTRACT AVL-Set:100 902 {(1|->1),(2|->4),(3|->9),(4|->16),(5|->25),(6|->36),(7|->49),(8|->64),(9|->81),(10|->100),(11|->121)... c3 CONCRETE FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:100 708 /*@symbolic*/ %x.(x : {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29... a2 ABSTRACT AVL-Set:100 602 {100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900,1000,1100,1200,1300,1400,1500,1600,1700,1800,1900,2000,2100,220... c2 CONCRETE FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:100 162 /*@symbolic*/ {x|x : (1 .. 10000) & x mod 100 = 0} c1 MEMOIZED FINITE-SYMBOLIC-Set:10000 154 /*@symbolic*/ %x.(x : (1 .. 10000)|x + x) Finished exporting constants_analysis to user_output
By using the -animate_stats flag, you can see execution times for operations that are executed either using the -execute or -animate commands. In verbose mode (-v flag) you also see the memory consumption.
$ probcli Debug.mch -execute_all -animate_stats % unused_constants(2,[a,c]) % Runtime for SOLUTION for SETUP_CONSTANTS: 79 ms (walltime: 80 ms) 1 : SETUP_CONSTANTS 91 ms walltime (89 ms runtime), since start: 1107 ms 2 : INITIALISATION 5 ms walltime (4 ms runtime), since start: 1112 ms 3 : Sqr 10 ms walltime (10 ms runtime), since start: 1123 ms 4 : Sqr 0 ms walltime (0 ms runtime), since start: 1123 ms 5 : Sqr 1 ms walltime (0 ms runtime), since start: 1124 ms 6 : Sqr 0 ms walltime (0 ms runtime), since start: 1124 ms 7 : Finished 3 ms walltime (4 ms runtime), since start: 1127 ms Infinite loop reached after 8 steps (looping on Finished). % Runtime for -execute: 116 ms (with gc: 116 ms, walltime: 119 ms); time since start: 1132 ms
You can obtain some profiling information using the -prob_profile command. This command unfortunately requires that ProB was compiled using special flags (-Dprob_profile=true and -Dprob_src_profile=true).
$ probcli ../prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tutorial/Debug.mch -execute_all -prob_profile ... -------------------------- ProB profile info after 5685 ms walltime (5248 ms runtime) ----Source Location Profiler Information---- ----Tracks number of times B statements (aka substitutions) are hit 1 hits at 9:15 -- 9:19 in /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tutorial/Debug.mch 1 hits at 12:37 -- 12:41 in /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tutorial/Debug.mch 4 hits at 11:29 -- 11:38 in /Users/leuschel/git_root/prob_examples/public_examples/B/Tutorial/Debug.mch ---- ---- ProB Runtime Profiler ---- ---- Tracks time spent in B operations and invariant evaluation $setup_constants : 78 ms (80 ms walltime & 80 ms max. walltime; #calls 1) Sqr : 9 ms (9 ms walltime & 9 ms max. walltime; #calls 1) $initialise_machine : 5 ms (5 ms walltime & 5 ms max. walltime; #calls 1) Finished : 3 ms (4 ms walltime & 4 ms max. walltime; #calls 1) Total Walltime: 98 ms for #calls 4