Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
* [[Well-Definedness_Checking|Well-definedness]]: ProB will try to check if your predicates are well-defined during animation or model checking, but there is currently no guarantee that all well-definedness errors will be detected. To be on the safe side, you should ensure that your formulas are well-defined according to the left-to-right definition of well-definedness employed in Rodin for Event-B. ProB now has a [[Well-Definedness_Checking|static checker for well-definedness]] which you can use for this. Note, however, that ProB may re-order conjuncts if this improves well-definedness. For example, for <tt>x:0..3 & y=10/x & x /=0</tt> ProB will not report an error as the conjunct <tt>x/=0</tt> is processed before the division. Indeed, while this predicate is not well-defined according to Rodin's left-to-right rule, it is well-defined according to the more liberal commutative definition of well-definedness. | * [[Well-Definedness_Checking|Well-definedness]]: ProB will try to check if your predicates are well-defined during animation or model checking, but there is currently no guarantee that all well-definedness errors will be detected. To be on the safe side, you should ensure that your formulas are well-defined according to the left-to-right definition of well-definedness employed in Rodin for Event-B. ProB now has a [[Well-Definedness_Checking|static checker for well-definedness]] which you can use for this. Note, however, that ProB may re-order conjuncts if this improves well-definedness. For example, for <tt>x:0..3 & y=10/x & x /=0</tt> ProB will not report an error as the conjunct <tt>x/=0</tt> is processed before the division. Indeed, while this predicate is not well-defined according to Rodin's left-to-right rule, it is well-defined according to the more liberal commutative definition of well-definedness. | ||
== Reflexive Closure == | |||
In version 1.8.0 (March 2018) ProB changed the definition of the transitive and reflexive closure operator of B. | |||
PorB now uses to the mathematical definition: | |||
<pre> | |||
closure(X) = id(TypeOfX) \/ closure1(X) | |||
</pre> | |||
This means that <tt>closure({1|->2}) </tt>is now infinite and contains for example the pair <tt>3|->3</tt>. The same holds for <tt> iterate({1|->2},0)</tt>. | |||
The previous definition was closure(X) = id(ran(X)\/dom(X)) \/ closure1(X) and | |||
the definition in Atelier-B was closure(X) = id(dom(X)) \/ closure1(X). | |||
However, both were not compatible with the following law in the B-Book on page 169 | |||
<pre> | |||
(r[a] <: a => closure(r)[a]=a) | |||
</pre> | |||
Take r = {1|->2}, then r[{3}] <: {3}. | |||
So, according to the law we have: <tt> closure(r)[{3}] = {3}</tt>. | |||
=== Limitations === | === Limitations === |
ProB Tcl/Tk can be installed as a plugin for Atelier B, so that ProB can be launched directly from within Atelier B projects. With this you can animate and model check B machines directly from within the IDE of Atelier-B.
The easiest is to perform the menu command "Install AtelierB 4 Plugin..." in the Help menu of ProB Tcl/Tk. This will create a file called probtclk.etool in an extensions folder next to Atelier B's bbin folder. The extensions folder is created if necessary.
Note: as the layout of Atelier-B's directories has changed, you need to use ProB 1.12.0 or newer for Atelier-B 4.7.1 or newer on macOS. You can also create the the above file yourself.
Here is a typical probtclk.etool file (where PathToProB depends on your location of the ProB installation folder containing the prob and probcli binaries):
<externalTool category="component" name="ProBTclTk" label="&Animate with ProB (Tcl/Tk)"> <toolParameter name="editor" type="tool" configure="yes" default="PathToProB/StartProB.sh" /> <command>${editor}</command> <param>${componentPath}</param> </externalTool>
Note, you can also ProB2-UI within Atelier-B by creating a suitable file prob2ui.etool in this extensions folder. Here is a typical file for macOS; the path needs to be adapted for your location and operating system (we plan to provide an installer within ProB2-UI):
<externalTool category="component" name="ProB2UI" label="&Animate with ProB2-UI"> <toolParameter name="editor" type="tool" configure="yes" default="/Applications/Development/ProB/ProB 2 UI.app/Contents/MacOS/ProB 2 UI" /> <command>${editor}</command> <param>--machine-file</param> <param>${componentPath}</param> </externalTool>
After installing the plugins you can launch ProB for selected B machines by right-clicking on a B machine within Atelier B:
Atelier B also enables to use ProB as a prover/disprover in the interactive proof window. For this you need to set the ProB_Path resource to point to probcli (command-line version of ProB). To do this you need to add the following line to the resource file of your project (replacing PATH by the the path on your machine to probcli):
ATB*PR*ProB_Path:PATH/probcli
Then you can type, e.g., the command prob(1)in the interactive proof window.
Two commands are provided within Atelier-B:
Atelier-B will call probcli using the commands -cbc_assertions_tautology_proof and -cbc_result_file after having encoded the proof obligation into the ASSERTIONS clause of a generated B machine.
The generated machine typically has the form:
MACHINE probNr SETS ... CONSTANTS ... PROPERTIES << ALL HYPOTHESES >> ASSERTIONS ( <<SELECTED HYPOTHESES >> => << PROOF GOAL >> ) END
In the REPL of probcli you can call the provers ML and PP of Atelier-B.
As of version 1.3, ProB contains a much improved parser which tries be compliant with Atelier B but provides extra features.
In version 1.8.0 (March 2018) ProB changed the definition of the transitive and reflexive closure operator of B. PorB now uses to the mathematical definition:
closure(X) = id(TypeOfX) \/ closure1(X)
This means that closure({1|->2}) is now infinite and contains for example the pair 3|->3. The same holds for iterate({1|->2},0). The previous definition was closure(X) = id(ran(X)\/dom(X)) \/ closure1(X) and the definition in Atelier-B was closure(X) = id(dom(X)) \/ closure1(X). However, both were not compatible with the following law in the B-Book on page 169
(r[a] <: a => closure(r)[a]=a)
Take r = {1|->2}, then r[{3}] <: {3}. So, according to the law we have: closure(r)[{3}] = {3}.