No edit summary |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/nantes_provers_only.pdf André, Attiogbé and Lanoix, Provers alone] | * [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/nantes_provers_only.pdf André, Attiogbé and Lanoix, Provers alone] | ||
* [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/nantes_tactic.pdf André, Attiogbé and Lanoix, Tactics] | * [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/nantes_tactic.pdf André, Attiogbé and Lanoix, Tactics] | ||
=== Further Models === | === Further Models === |
We benchmarked the ProB disprove for an article currently under consideration for SEFM 2015.
All raw data is available as csv files from here. A zip file containing all csv files is available here.
Due to the page limit, we could not give all the diagrams and visualisation of the benchmark results in the article. They are available here: