No edit summary |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/tactic_all_models.pdf Tactics on all Models] | * [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/tactic_all_models.pdf Tactics on all Models] | ||
=== Surplus of ProB == | === Surplus of ProB === | ||
* [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/surplus.pdf Surplus of ProB (added last)] | * [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/surplus.pdf Surplus of ProB (added last)] | ||
* [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/surplus2.pdf Surplus of ProB (added first)] | * [http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/models/sefm2015_disprover/output/surplus2.pdf Surplus of ProB (added first)] |
We benchmarked the ProB disprove for an article currently under consideration for SEFM 2015.
All raw data is available as csv files from here. A zip file containing all csv files is available here.
Due to the page limit, we could not give all the diagrams and visualisation of the benchmark results in the article. They are available here: